Judgment Hand Down: Purkiss v Kennedy (Court of Appeal)

On 14 March, the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Purkiss v Kennedy [2025] EWCA Civ 268.

 

The case concerned payments made through an employee benefit trust (EBT). This form of tax planning was widespread in the period 2005-2015 but was subsequently held by the Supreme Court in the Rangers litigation ([2017] UKSC 45) to be ineffective.

 

The money had been paid into the EBT by a company called Ethos Solutions Limited. It subsequently entered liquidation and the liquidator pursued a section 423 Insolvency Act 1986 claim against the ultimate recipients of the money. The key issue for the Court of Appeal was whether an intention to avoid the incurring of a tax liability to HMRC was a prohibited purpose under section 423. The Court of Appeal held that it was not because, in short, seeking to avoid the incurring of a liability does not involve seeking to prejudice a potential creditor.

 

Daniel Bayfield KC and Jon Colclough (with solicitor advocate Luke Tucker Harrison) acted for the successful respondents, instructed by Keidan Harrison LLP.

 

The judgment is available at https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2025/268.html

News you may be interested in
Events
South Square Digest
South Square Digest is our quarterly review of news, cases, judgments and articles covering all our practice areas.
South Square Digest
Contact us
Scroll To Top