The judgment addresses two important points on the reflective loss principle which were left open by the Supreme Court’s judgment in Sevilleja v Marex  AC 39. First, overruling the English Court of Appeal’s decision in Nectrus Ltd v UCP Plc  EWCA Civ 57, the Privy Council held that the relevant time for determining whether a loss is reflective is the point at which the loss is suffered, not when the claim is made. Secondly, the Privy Council held that the reflective loss principle will not bar a claim unless the shareholder and the company have a claim against the same wrongdoer. It is not enough that the defendant to the shareholder’s claim may be able to pass on his liability to the defendant to the company’s claim. Tom Smith QC, Richard Fisher QC and Robert Amey appeared for Primeo. William Willson and Toby Brown appeared for the Bank of Bermuda.
South Square is a leading set of commercial law barristers. Our members have acted in many of the most important restructuring, insolvency, banking, commercial, company and fraud-related disputes of recent times. We are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
Privy Council hands down judgment in Primeo v Bank of Bermuda
The Privy Council has handed down judgment in Part 1 of the appeal in Primeo v Bank of Bermuda  UKPC 22.
The Privy Council has handed down judgment in Part 1 of the appeal in Primeo v Bank of Bermuda  UKPC 22…
News you may be interested in
South Square wins at the TRI Awards 2023
Judgment Hand Down: Re Zhang Zhenxin
South Square celebrates shortlisting for the TRI Awards 2023
Link Fund Solutions Limited – Update on Convening Hearing
Judgment Hand Down: Darty Holdings SAS v Carton-Kelly
South Square welcomes new barrister, Philip Judd
Judgment Hand Down: Re Sova Capital
Legal 500 Bar Awards 2023
The Forward Thinking Conference
Chambers UK Bar Awards 2023