The judgment addresses two important points on the reflective loss principle which were left open by the Supreme Court’s judgment in Sevilleja v Marex [2021] AC 39. First, overruling the English Court of Appeal’s decision in Nectrus Ltd v UCP Plc [2021] EWCA Civ 57, the Privy Council held that the relevant time for determining whether a loss is reflective is the point at which the loss is suffered, not when the claim is made. Secondly, the Privy Council held that the reflective loss principle will not bar a claim unless the shareholder and the company have a claim against the same wrongdoer. It is not enough that the defendant to the shareholder’s claim may be able to pass on his liability to the defendant to the company’s claim. Tom Smith QC, Richard Fisher QC and Robert Amey appeared for Primeo. William Willson and Toby Brown appeared for the Bank of Bermuda.
South Square is a leading set of commercial law barristers. Our members have acted in many of the most important restructuring, insolvency,
banking, commercial, company and fraud-related disputes of recent times. We are regulated by the Bar Standards Board.
The Privy Council has handed down judgment in Part 1 of the appeal in Primeo v Bank of Bermuda [2021] UKPC 22.
The Privy Council has handed down judgment in Part 1 of the appeal in Primeo v Bank of Bermuda [2021] UKPC 22…
News you may be interested in
South Square team maintains Commercial Court injunctions freezing more than US$400 million
07/10/2024
Events
June
September
South Square Digest
South Square Digest is our quarterly review of news, cases, judgments and articles covering all our practice areas.